Identity Theft Facebook
Makes it the number 2
Kaspersky Lab experts point out that there was little change in the list of the Top-5 main sources of phishing relating to last month: India ranks first with 14.4% of all spam distributed, followed by Brazil (10, 1%), Indonesia (9%), South Korea (7.3%) and Peru (4.9%). Spain occupies the fifteenth place in the statistics of spam-source countries (1.8%), so it fell two positions relative to last month.
Surely these last months of 2011 all have heard the media several times the word "Phishing" and also link most of the time with internet banking. Because of the confusion that exists in some Internet and media, which can lead to confusion to internet users for the treatment of so alarmist news, where even we can deduce that online banking is not secure, leaving in question the safety of banks. For all this, the Association of Internet says that is Phishing and how to protect it. "Phishing" is a type of fraud with the aim of trying to get users to their data, passwords, bank accounts, credit card numbers, identities, and so on. In short, "all possible data" and then be used fraudulently. It can be summarized easily, deceiving the possible scam, "supplanting the image of a company or public entity", so they "believe" the victim may actually come from the site information requested "official" when in fact is.
Identity Theft Facebook
A wide range of software and applications of all types that are classified under the category of theft of personal or financial information, some of them very complex, as the use of javascript floating window on the browser address bar to to confuse the user. Some of the most common with this type of emails are:
Use of names of existing companies.
Use the name of an actual employee of a company like fake mail sender.
Web addresses with the correct appearance.
Man-in-the-middle In this technique, the attacker is between the user and the real website, acting as a proxy. Thus, it is able to listen to all communication between them.
Exploiting vulnerabilities Cross-Site Scripting in a Web site to simulate a secure web page from a bank
Exploiting vulnerabilities in Internet Explorer on the client
Some attacks of this type also use exploits on fraudulent websites, taking advantage of a vulnerability in Internet Explorer or operating system
Man-in-the-middle In this technique, the attacker is between the user and the real website, acting as a proxy. Thus, it is able to listen to all communication between them.
Exploiting vulnerabilities Cross-Site Scripting in a Web site to simulate a secure web page from a bank
Exploiting vulnerabilities in Internet Explorer on the client
Some attacks of this type also use exploits on fraudulent websites, taking advantage of a vulnerability in Internet Explorer or operating system
Another more sophisticated technique is called Pharming. This is a fraudulent tactic is to change the contents of the DNS to redirect browsers to fake pages instead of the real when users access them through your browser.
The Kaspersky Lab experts say that one of the major changes in September was the rise of social networking site Facebook from fourth to second place in terms of organizations targeted by phishers. The number of attacks in this service increased by 5.4% to 14.1% of the total. In September, the attacks against eBay were a little less intense (-0.9%) compared to August and is now again in the third position among the most popular targets of phishing. Paypal continues to lead the ranking hogging 34.9%. Many have received phishing attacks on Facebook, warning that someone has added or has invited you to something, you click on the address takes you to a page identical to the Facebook login is not just that. Enter your information and WHAM!, Go straight to the mail of others. Curious thing about this phishing is well done that is because the address is not hacking666.com/facebook but a much more misleading: facebook.com. How do they do? For by subdomains. The original facebook address is:
Identity Theft Facebookfacebook.com / profile / id = hgmgjcc The phishing in this case becomes (for example):
facebook.com.profile.id.hgmgj.cc The phishing domain is hgmgj.cc but if you look quickly it seems it really comes facebook.com. I recommend reading and doing small tests and games to put on phishing and long train to avoid falling into these computer crimes so fashionable.
Care. If you have a Facebook profile in your mailbox can receive a friend request to look as real as this:
Identity Theft Facebook
Eye, is not Facebook. It seems that someone entertains friend requests sending these perfectly made with a single purpose: to steal your account (phishing) on Facebook to make mischief in the social network, or out of it using your data. The most important: no click on it, read Do you know the person sending the request? No? ... Well first of all is to ignore it. If you look at the image illustrating this post is fairly common name who does not know of a Joseph? If you doubt and the name sounded Facebook regularly opened and the request should appear reflected in the activity icons. If not start thinking wrong. To the mailbox that you have arrived? In my case has come to an (I have to battle with 10 different mail accounts) that is not assigned to my Facebook ID, white and bottle. The thing smells of death.
update new of profitable ideas
Next we identify a site that is passed through the system login Facebook in English. Below is the phishing site.
Perhaps the quickest way to identify a phishing site is through the domain, however, we can mention some other elements described below: The domain hxxp: / / www.fuizesbooks.com not resemble the official domain facebook: https://www.facebook.com/login.php. In fact, it is reported malicious IP addresses to the United States. On the other hand, the security feature (https) is not enabled. In the original site, the name describes the site is Log In | Facebook and the phishing appears Login | Facebook. Finally the most important feature of this determined phishing is that the domain belongs to a class of so-called fast-flux network, in which, that domain responds to different IP addresses. This feature too difficult to cancel these sites, as it would have to notify each of the IPs, resulting from the consultation in order to completely disable the site. However, if the attacker enlists new IP addresses, it creates a difficult cycle to break.
According to a recent report, based on a sample of 3 million users and collected over a period of about 3 months, approximately 45% of the time, users provide their credentials for admission to phishing sites they visit. It is important to note that banking institutions or similar NEVER request confidential information through these channels. They already have such data and backed it. If we see, in such case, which should apply in case you forgot or lost. Therefore, we must be alert to request personal information and never provide information on our credit cards or credentials that allow the hacker to enter our systems. It is also important to verify that the url to which we are entering requested corresponds to the entity.
The main damage caused by phishing are:
Overall identity fraud incidents decreased in the United States in 2010—The number of identity fraud incidents decreased by 28 percent over the past year, which brought them down to levels not seen since 2007. The mean fraud amount per victim declined from $4,991 in 2009 to $4,607. One likely contributing factor was the significant drop in reported data breaches according to industry reports: 404 in 2010 with 26 million records exposed, compared to 604 in 2009 with 221 million records exposed.
Consumer fraud costs increased in 2010—While fraud incidents decreased, the mean consumer out-of-pocket cost due to identity fraud increased 63 percent from $387 in 2009 to $631 per incident in 2010. This may be attributable to changes in the types of fraud perpetrated in 2010, including new account and debit card fraud, highlighting the need for continued consumer vigilance. Consumer fraud costs include costs incurred by the victim towards payoff of any fraudulent debt as well as fees (legal or otherwise) to resolve fraudulent claims.
The main damage caused by phishing are:
Overall identity fraud incidents decreased in the United States in 2010—The number of identity fraud incidents decreased by 28 percent over the past year, which brought them down to levels not seen since 2007. The mean fraud amount per victim declined from $4,991 in 2009 to $4,607. One likely contributing factor was the significant drop in reported data breaches according to industry reports: 404 in 2010 with 26 million records exposed, compared to 604 in 2009 with 221 million records exposed.
Consumer fraud costs increased in 2010—While fraud incidents decreased, the mean consumer out-of-pocket cost due to identity fraud increased 63 percent from $387 in 2009 to $631 per incident in 2010. This may be attributable to changes in the types of fraud perpetrated in 2010, including new account and debit card fraud, highlighting the need for continued consumer vigilance. Consumer fraud costs include costs incurred by the victim towards payoff of any fraudulent debt as well as fees (legal or otherwise) to resolve fraudulent claims.
1. Identity Theft and users' confidential data (credit cards, passwords. 2. Loss of productivity. 3. Consumption of corporate network resources (bandwidth, saturation mail, etc.)..
According to a study by security company McAfee, model Heidi Klum is the celebrity most commonly used by cybercriminals to introduce malware and phishing in computers when doing internet searches on your behalf. The multinational security said that cybercriminals often use celebrity names to lure web sites with malicious software and so searches for "Heidi Klum", "Heidi Klum downloads", "Recent Photos Heidi Klum" and "Heidi Klum videos" are most at risk of being infected. McAfee's research reveals that users find and download the latest pictures of Heidi Klum has a 9% chance of ending up in a malware website. The five most dangerous searches: the # 1 spot on the list is for Heidi Klum, followed by actress Cameron Diaz, the British journalist and editor Piers Morgan, actress Jessica Biel and Kathrine Heigl.
According to a study by security company McAfee, model Heidi Klum is the celebrity most commonly used by cybercriminals to introduce malware and phishing in computers when doing internet searches on your behalf. The multinational security said that cybercriminals often use celebrity names to lure web sites with malicious software and so searches for "Heidi Klum", "Heidi Klum downloads", "Recent Photos Heidi Klum" and "Heidi Klum videos" are most at risk of being infected. McAfee's research reveals that users find and download the latest pictures of Heidi Klum has a 9% chance of ending up in a malware website. The five most dangerous searches: the # 1 spot on the list is for Heidi Klum, followed by actress Cameron Diaz, the British journalist and editor Piers Morgan, actress Jessica Biel and Kathrine Heigl.
The best advice is to keep updated protection programs installed on your computer, especially the operating system, browser and e-mail. Make a continuous update of the antivirus that can identify files that contain malicious code. These codes can be entered in different ways (email, online downloads, etc..) And are continuously changing. It is important to install other programs of protection such as anti-spywares that are recognized for their effectiveness and a firewall (software that blocks all traffic in and out of computer data), passing only the authorized user. Differentiate A Facebook Phishing emails look the Mail Both Almost Exactly the Same. Here is How You Can differentiate the phishing email from the real.
update new of profitable ideas
Differentiate A Phishing Facebook Mail
Both the emails look almost exactly the same. Here is how you can differentiate the phishing email from the real.
Both the emails look almost exactly the same. Here is how you can differentiate the phishing email from the real.
1. Subject of the email – I have several facebook accounts signed up with different email address and never did I receive any email from Facebook about “notification pending“. Facebook will not email you regarding your pending notification and ask you to login to your account.
2. No name personalization – If you have noticed, the original email from Facebook starts off with “Hi Damien” while the malware email starts off with “Hi“.
3. Content of the email – I login to Facebook at least once everyday, so it is not correct that “You haven’t been back to Facebook recently“. In addition, I have more than 3 pending friends requests, which means the content is absolutely wrong.
Identity Theft Facebook4. Link not pionting to Facebook.com – The last and most obvious clue is that when hover your mouse over the link, it does not point to Facebook.com. Instead it is pointing to “buildyourvision.com”. I never knew that Facebook is related to buildyourvision.
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment